| CASE STUDIES IN COPYRIGHT PERMISSIONS
AND CLEARANCE Introduction
The following case studies illustrate, through real-world
examples, various situations that may arise when attempting
to obtain permission from copyright holders to display their
materials online. We chose to present these case studies
in the first person to best illustrate how case-specific
and involved the interaction and relationship between
the copyright permissions analyst and the copyright holder
can be. It is certainly necessary to have in place a system
of procedures for seeking copyright permissions that can
be evaluated and revised to improve efficiency over the
course of the project. However, equally essential on a day-to-day
basis are flexibility, resourcefulness, patience, persistence,
and "people" skills. While a clear plan for moving
through the permission-seeking process is indispensable,
these more intangible elements play an enormous part in
ultimate effectiveness and success.
-- Stephanie Boris, Copyright Permissions Analyst, Pacific
Film Archive
Book Publisher Source Is Not Copyright Holder In
this case, the source of the document, an excerpt from a
book, was not the copyright holder. When I contacted the
publisher of this book, I was told that I needed to contact
the author directly. I was given a mailing address for the
author, so I sent a letter with the permissions pack. He
e-mailed me and eventually sent back the signed form.
Case Study 1. Book Author
(click for details)
Book Publisher Source Is Copyright Holder
In this case the publisher was the source and copyright
holder of several book excerpts, so I worked directly with
them and secured permission to display material not just
from one book, but from several different books, with one
permission form.
Case Study 2: Book Publisher
(click for details)
Magazine: Still in Process
This is a good example of a straightforward copyright holder,
the source and publisher of the document, who seems inclined
to grant permission. However, the wheels of the organization
turn slowly, and it is hard to actually connect with the
person I have made contact with when I make follow-up calls.
As I did in this case, I have found that at a big organization
like a magazine or a newspaper, a very good first contact
to make is with the company's librarian. Librarians are
usually approachable, and are "wired" differently from the
more corporate types. They want to figure out how to get
done what we need done, and who we should speak with to
facilitate the process.
Therefore, I contacted the librarian at this magazine,
and he gave me a name and a direct number for someone to
talk to. After seven phone calls (with messages left each
time), and two months, I finally was able to speak to the
person in charge of permissions. She said it "should be
fine," but it has now been three more months, and she still
has not managed to get the okay from her legal department
and get back to me.
Case Study 3: Magazine
Still in Process (click
for details)
Magazine: Permission Granted
This case, also a magazine, is similar to the previous
example in the considerable time and effort required. However
in this example, six months after the initial contact, we
were successful and received permission. It shows, I think,
how different each entity is, and that it is not possible
to take "short cuts" and second-guess what a
given category of organization or copyright holder is going
to do. This particular magazine is published by a large
company, and yet they have a markedly different policy about
their content than, for example, some other major newspaper
and magazine publishers do.
Case Study 4: Magazine
Permission Granted
(click for details)
Newspaper With Prohibitively Expensive Permissions Cost
Certain newspapers or magazines allow display of their
articles, but only under conditions that are so prohibitive
(such as a licensing fee for each individual article that
covers only a limited term of use) that permission is effectively
denied to non-profit entities like ours that wish to freely
display possibly hundreds of different articles for an unlimited,
continuous period. In attempting to obtain permission to
display materials published by this newspaper publisher,
for example, I learned that it does not permit display of
any material without a license and substantial fee payment.
In our case, the fee amount was quoted at a minimum of $20,000.
However, it is often possible to link to articles on a copyright
holder’s own website, which we did in this case.
Case Study 5: Major Daily
Newspaper (click for details)
Newspaper With Content By Freelance Writers
Many periodicals employ writers who hold individual copyright
to their work and can be contacted directly. This example
concerns a newspaper that essentially does not own the copyright
to any of its material. Pursuing permissions is a matter
of tracking down the writers, some of whom the publication
staff can help us find. We then send permission forms to
individual writers, usually via initial e-mail contact and
then by sending the permissions packets to a mailing address.
This process is an ongoing task that has been underway
for the past year. I assume this process will continue for
some time, as we gradually are succeeding in contacting
each individual writer personally. Seeking out copyright
permission from these authors tends to be very effective,
because individual writers, once you find them, are almost
always willing to give permission. In fact, I don't think
a single one of them has refused!
Case Study 6: Freelance
Writer Max A. (click
for details)
Online Linking
Online linking is a significant means of accessing material
that is otherwise not made available by the publisher or
copyright holder. Primarily in the case of newspapers, articles
and reviews are made available on the newspapers website.
There is no restriction on linking to these articles from
our own website, and no formal permission is required. Thus,
we can provide links on relevant pages in the CineFiles
site (www.mip.berkeley.edu/cinefiles)
that take the user directly to the relevant pages on the
copyright holder's website.
What is actually available through linking, and whether
it is free or not to the user, is often a complex matter,
with newspapers sometimes having different restrictions
on material before or after a certain date. We have opted
to provide links to articles on other entities' websites
if this is the only way our users can get easy access to
the material. At present, our policy is to link only
to materials offered on the publishers websites at no charge.
The case below is that of a newspaper and a high-profile
freelance writer whose material was not owned by the newspaper
in which it was published. Ultimately this writer put up
his own website, on which his reviews are available at no
charge. For purposes of our project, we are providing links
from our website to his website, for the articles we have
in our database.
And so begins the saga of one of the longest-running, if
not THE longest running interchanges in my journal.
Case Study 7: Providing
Access via Linking (click
for details)
Film Studio Press Kits
Although this is an esoteric category that will most likely
not be represented in other organizations' materials, I
have included it here as an example of a realm that has
been particularly difficult to penetrate. Moreover, since
these materials are essentially "public relations" documents,
they are likely to be analogous to any materials in a collection
that originate with a PR agency. Studios (and public relations
firms) are organizations that do not normally receive requests
such as ours. At the same time, they have large legal departments,
and the rest of their staff has seemingly been trained to
refrain from making any sort of unilateral decision. These
organizations tend to hire younger people, and as a result,
there is a huge turnover. These factors combine to create
a situation in which a permissions packet will be sent from
one person to the next, through a maze of higher-ups, and
tracking it is made all the more challenging by the fact
that one's original contact person has often left the company
by the time the second or third follow-up call is made.
Case Study 8: Film Studio
(click for details)
|